Official Partners

Warez-DDL
ebook-hell
ebook-land
katzdownload
Warez & Scene Links
downtopc
Movieblogarea
Topliste Download Suche ebook-hell archivx.to warezload.net - Topliste http://bestoflinks.synology.me szene.link LinkBase http://poster.themasoftware crawli download suchmaschine byte
http://creator.themasoftware.com/
https://bc.game/i-4cyp45osg-n//
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Limitations of the Open Mind
#1
[Image: 47ce83f5f375b123daa4170a061e1e89.jpg]

The Limitations of the Open Mind | 1.87 MB

Title: The Limitations of the Open Mind
Author: Jeremy Fantl
Category: Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Political
Language: English | 248 Pages | ISBN: 0751573833


Description:
When should you engage with difficult arguments against your cherished controversial beliefs? The primary conclusion of this book is that your obligations to engage with counterarguments are more limited than is often thought. In some standard situations, you shouldn't engage with difficult counterarguments and, if you do, you shouldn't engage with them open-mindedly. This conclusion runs counter to aspects of the Millian political tradition and political liberalism, as well as what people working in informal logic tend to say about argumentation. Not all misleading arguments wear their flaws on their sleeve. Each step of a misleading argument might seem compelling and you might not be able to figure out what's wrong with it. Still, even if you can't figure out what's wrong with an argument, you can know that it's misleading. One way to know that an argument is misleading is, counterintuitively, to lack expertise in the methods and evidence-types employed by the argument. When you know that a counterargument is misleading, you shouldn't engage with it open-mindedly and sometimes shouldn't engage with it at all. You shouldn't engage open-mindedly because you shouldn't be willing to reduce your confidence in response to arguments you know are misleading. And you sometimes shouldn't engage closed-mindedly, because to do so can be manipulative or ineffective. In making this case, Jeremy Fantl discusses echo chambers and group polarization, the importance in academic writing of a sympathetic case for the opposition, the epistemology of disagreement, the account of open-mindedness, and invitations to problematic academic speakers.

DOWNLOAD:

https://rapidgator.net/file/cbf4ba314b9d...n_Mind.rar

https://nitroflare.com/view/6ED906BCE24D...n_Mind.rar
Reply
Thanks given by:


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Musical - Poetic Mind A Journey Through the Cognitive Science of Popular Songs Emperor2011 0 4 Yesterday, 06:02 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  The Healthy Programmer Refactor Your Fitness, Improve Your Mind, 2nd Edition Emperor2011 0 4 Yesterday, 05:53 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  In My Mindful Era 90 Days to Focus Your Mind, Practice Pr Emperor2011 0 7 06-02-2026, 01:19 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  Culinary Psychology Food Choices and the Mind-Body Connection Emperor2011 0 12 05-30-2026, 10:35 AM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  Change Your Mind, Change Your Life The Transformative Power of Lojong Practice Emperor2011 0 19 05-26-2026, 04:01 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  Releasing the Knot of the Mind Instructions on Resting in Stillness and Awareness Emperor2011 0 14 05-23-2026, 06:08 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  Open Digital Innovation A Contest Driven Approach Second Edition Emperor2011 0 13 05-23-2026, 05:56 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  Healthy Everyday High Fiber 70 Delicious Recipes Designed with Nutrition in Mind Emperor2011 0 15 05-20-2026, 10:28 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  Spirituality in Mind Psychiatry in a Post - Secular Age Emperor2011 0 18 05-19-2026, 02:53 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011
  Skymind The Radical Path of Open Awareness Emperor2011 0 24 05-13-2026, 02:09 PM
Last Post: Emperor2011

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)